Saturday, May 28, 2011

My Stand on the Military, National Defense and International Affairs

My personal beliefs and the efforts of The Mothers Institute as they relate to an Anti-War, Pro-Peace stand are in no way intended to be disrespectful of the military -- in fact quite the contrary --  they are intended to honor our servicemen and women by working toward bringing them safely home and out of harm's way.

The following points help clarify the reasons for this position:

3.1 National Defense
We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.
3.3 International Affairs
American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.

Note: The above points are taken from Libertarian Party Platform. Readers of this blog need not agree with other aspects of the LP Platform to appreciate, relate to, and respect the sentiments expressed via these segments. Additionally worth noting is that my personal anti-war, pro-peace efforts and goals (and those of The Mothers Institute -- the organization I founded and serve as Director) are not political, but rather revolve around the desire to work with all individuals, groups, and organizations that share in this anti-war, pro-peace mission and message.


Jan

No comments:

Post a Comment